Sparty1Fan abusing

This is the abuser's steam ID
STEAM_0:0:187439134
The abuser's discord
Sparty1fan#0666
Sparty1fan#066
Reason for this report?
 Sparty1Fan kept killing me when we was on duty and he killed my friend when he was on duty then i made a RDM report on him and bro took it and finished it instantly I lost a shipment of good weapons cause of this.

bro shouldn't even be on the mod team its just embarrassing that this guy even got trial-mod
seeing that there is back to back reports on this guy is just a bad look for the moderation team.
Clips
part one of him abusing
part 2 of him abusing
part 3 of him abusing

---

I had to use an exploit to kill him cause he did damage to me with a sniper (on duty) and i couldn't kill him with anything else

real
https://vimeo.com/790215216

+Rep

1. Him killing you while on-duty is a no-no all around (also admin abuse)

2. This shouldn't need to be said but I guess it has to, on-duty should be only used for dealing with sits/reports (hence the name "On-Duty") (clarification)

3. If the waifu class isn't an on-duty one then he shouldn't have had no-clip too (admin power abuse)

4. He closed a sit that was specifically on him that should've been dealt with by a higher up (unprofessional)

5. Revenge RDMing your friend is also against the rules so not only did he close a sit against him but he also BROKE THE BASIC RULES while ON-DUTY (bruh seriously)

Overall: +Rep

This needs to be dealt with accordingly because this shouldn't stand in any way, shape, or form. Also the fact that this is 2 weeks old.

(This response is not biased, I have not seen the offender in question try to defend himself and he has been proven guilty with evidence provided.)

+Rep

1. Him killing you while on-duty is a no-no all around (also admin abuse)

2. This shouldn't need to be said but I guess it has to, on-duty should be only used for dealing with sits/reports (hence the name "On-Duty") (clarification)

3. If the waifu class isn't an on-duty one then he shouldn't have had no-clip too (admin power abuse)

4. He closed a sit that was specifically on him that should've been dealt with by a higher up (unprofessional)

5. Revenge RDMing your friend is also against the rules so not only did he close a sit against him but he also BROKE THE BASIC RULES while ON-DUTY (bruh seriously)

Overall: +Rep

This needs to be dealt with accordingly because this shouldn't stand in any way, shape, or form. Also the fact that this is 2 weeks old.

(This response is not biased, I have not seen the offender in question try to defend himself and he has been proven guilty with evidence provided.)

I already dealt with this I just didn't reply to it, we was punished accordingly and harshly.